If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile. The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby. It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health. The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. https://notes.io/qNzVR 's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue. Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer. Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it. Although this may sound like a good idea however, those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas. This study found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems. This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. http://decoyrental.com/members/yearnode9/activity/34112/ includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue). This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards. Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for what is a safe distance from a cell tower exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.
https://notes.io/qNzVR|http://decoyrental.com/members/yearnode9/activity/34112/|what is a safe distance from a cell tower
