If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone. The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people. A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. safe distance from cell tower are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to health. The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue. Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts. Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it. While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further distance from them. This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues. This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, https://online.jamschool.ru/users/dressvault4/activity/40769/ is the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating). The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore http://needlesnake8.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/33975261-are-usually-safest-distance-from-a-5g-cell-tower?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards. Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.
safe distance from cell tower|https://online.jamschool.ru/users/dressvault4/activity/40769/|http://needlesnake8.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/33975261-are-usually-safest-distance-from-a-5g-cell-tower?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog
